<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exploited Web &#187; cloaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.exploitedweb.com/tag/cloaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.exploitedweb.com</link>
	<description>Arbiter between Virtuality and Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 11:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cloaking can be ethical</title>
		<link>http://blog.exploitedweb.com/search-engine-marketing/cloaking-can-be-ethical/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.exploitedweb.com/search-engine-marketing/cloaking-can-be-ethical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Discipulo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.exploitedweb.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another term other than cloaking should be made in reference to this kind of SEO practice; maybe alternate content or backup content perhaps.  Showing content with different presentation or in different format is not a bad SEO habit. This is just to optimize your content for whatever device that reads your content. Examples of readers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another term other than <em>cloaking</em> should be made in reference to this kind of SEO practice; maybe <em>alternate content</em> or <em>backup content</em> perhaps.  Showing content with different presentation or in different format is not a bad SEO habit. This is just to optimize your content for whatever device that reads your content. Examples  of readers are standard web browsers, text browsers, SmartPhone/WAP browsers, hand-held devices with built-in browsers, screen readers and search engine bots.</p>
<p><div style="float:right;padding-left:10px"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4734545978679819";
google_ad_slot = "3906812392";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
</div></p>
<p>Cloaking is practically a black hat SEO method that presents a totally different content rather than the  content it should present. So how can cloaking be an ethical SEO method?</p>
<p>Consider a full Flash site with all the content embedded on it. How can search engines crawl the content on your Flash-based site? The solution is simple&#8211;cloaking. By utilizing the CSS method of making a block invisible, you can display your Flash site as well as the content you intended to get indexed on search engines.</p>
<p>Consider this Flash site with cloaked content: <a href="http://www.wideout.com/">Wideout Technology Services, Inc.</a></p>
<p>The content you see is embedded on Flash itself but I did include the same original text within the HTML and did use CSS to hide the text to the actual audience. Now, try viewing the source code <em>(View then Page Source or CTRL+U on Firefox)</em>. You will notice the original content on the HTML itself and if you look more closely, you will see the context enclosed in this block:</p>
<pre id="line31">&lt;<span>div</span><span> class</span>=<span>"noflash"</span>&gt;
 &lt;<span>h1</span>&gt;A True Global Workplace&lt;/<span>h1</span>&gt;
 &lt;<span>p</span>&gt;We believe that a business should not submit to geography.
  ...
&lt;/div&gt;</pre>
<p>And in my style sheet goes the trick to hide the text content to browsers but not to search engines and text/screen readers:</p>
<pre id="line1">.noflash {
	display: none !important;
}</pre>
<p>For the conclusion, you can ethically use cloaking to your site&#8217;s pages provided you are still showing the same original content to both search engines and your actual viewers/users.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.exploitedweb.com/search-engine-marketing/cloaking-can-be-ethical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

